The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: Ownership - AFC

By punisher
7/12/2016 11:06 pm
Knowing I did the NFC ( https://mfn7.myfootballnow.com/forums/thread/1/456?page=1&x=ZDJm5vBBt1#1007 ) I will do now the AFC


here are my findings


AFC East
New England - 1 owner - 111-33 (.771)
Miami - 6 owners - 75-69 (.521)
New Jersey - 5 owners - 62-82 (.431)
Buffalo - 7 owners - 37-107 (.257)


AFC North
Baltimore - 2 owners - 100-44 (.694)
Cincinnati - 3 owners - 63-81 (.438)
Cleveland - 5 owners - 61-83 (.424)
Pittsburgh - 7 owners - 41-103 (.285)


AFC South
Tennessee - 2 owners - 102-42 (.708)
Jacksonville - 7 owners - 88-56 (.611)
Indianapolis - 7 owners - 49-95 (.340)
Houston - 3 owners - 39-105 (.271)


AFC West
San Diego - 1 owner - 127-17 (.882)
Oakland - 5 owners - 70-74 (.486)
Kansas City - 6 owners* - 56-88 (.389)
Denver - 4 owners - 48-96 (.333)

* currently doesn't have a owner to speak of


total owners----total wins-losses
71-------------------1129-1185 (.488)


few notes
AFC East , AFC North and AFC West all have 1 team over the .500 winning percentage
San Diego really shows they are the class all by themselves and over this conference
Buffalo shows they are the worst team in the conference if you go by winning percentage.
Buffalo , Indianapolis , Jacksonville and Pittsburgh have the most owners with 7 which if Kansas City gets a new owner they will tie this group.
New England and San Diego have the fewest owners with 1
This AFC is the 3rd best conference behind the MFN 1 and MFN 2 ones that I have done so far.


MFN 1 = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/forums/thread/1/968?page=1#5472
MFN 2 = https://mfn2.myfootballnow.com/forums/thread/1/729?page=1#2449
Last edited at 7/12/2016 11:17 pm

Re: Ownership - AFC

By Pittball1
7/13/2016 5:35 pm
Pittsburgh may have had 7 owners, but this 7th owner who has had the team for 1 and a half seasons now(still in rebuild mode) doesn't plan on even thinking about leaving till he gets 7 rings!!

Re: Ownership - AFC

By jgcruz
7/13/2016 7:32 pm
You appear to headed in the right direction.

Re: Ownership - AFC

By Brohl
7/13/2016 10:29 pm
Thanks for doing this punisher!! and thanks for the one in MFN2 also. Indy is on the rise fellows!!!

Re: Ownership - AFC

By King of Bling
7/14/2016 8:16 am
cruz has a dynasty

Re: Ownership - AFC

By jgcruz
7/14/2016 9:30 am
King of Bling wrote:
cruz has a dynasty


Thanks for the compliment. Don't know how long SD can remain super competitive, I've pretty well transitioned the offense from the team I originally built. Now I have to turn my attention to an aging defense.

I was surprised in the off season when three of my coaches retired, including my head coach. All in their mid-fifties. ***?

Good luck to everyone this season.

Re: Ownership - AFC

By King of Bling
7/14/2016 4:41 pm
jgcruz wrote:
King of Bling wrote:
cruz has a dynasty


Thanks for the compliment. Don't know how long SD can remain super competitive, I've pretty well transitioned the offense from the team I originally built. Now I have to turn my attention to an aging defense.

I was surprised in the off season when three of my coaches retired, including my head coach. All in their mid-fifties. ***?

Good luck to everyone this season.


Most of us have many teams...you focus on one and they are outstanding!!!

Re: Ownership - AFC

By jgcruz
7/14/2016 5:39 pm
King of Bling wrote:
jgcruz wrote:
King of Bling wrote:
cruz has a dynasty


Thanks for the compliment. Don't know how long SD can remain super competitive, I've pretty well transitioned the offense from the team I originally built. Now I have to turn my attention to an aging defense.

I was surprised in the off season when three of my coaches retired, including my head coach. All in their mid-fifties. ***?

Good luck to everyone this season.


Most of us have many teams...you focus on one and they are outstanding!!!



I don't know how you guys do it. FWIW, my main advice to newbies is to start with and play with only one team. IMO, it's the best way to learn all of the nuances that MFN offers. But I understand that others feel differently and the lure to control more than one team is hard to resist. ****, even I am tempted to take on another team or two from time to time. But I don't have time to micro-manage more than one. Sometimes RL sucks that way.

Re: Ownership - AFC

By King of Bling
7/14/2016 5:51 pm
...and on the flip side. I, and I assume others with numerous teams, don't manage them closely enough to max them. Oh well, we play for fun and whatever gives you the most enjoyment, have at it :-)
The fact remains, SD rocks!!