People who liked this post
Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
League News/General Discussion
deanezag
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by deanezag @ 7/19/2016 9:13 pm
Brrexkl wrote:
punisher wrote:
Brrexkl wrote:

I look at Pat Strobe of Cincy, who was Converted (likely from TE) as he has 75/97 Run Blocking and 83/92 Pass Blocking. He Weighs 231 lbs, (6% Above Average) and is 24 in his 3rd Season in the MFN. He's a 74/85 as a RB.
He was 4th in Rushing at 1,584 Yards with 14 TD at 5.5 YPC with a Long of 53.
Pat Strobe in only 3 Seasons seems to have become a rather Effective RB, and still has room to grow in Ball Carrying and Breat Tackle.
So it looks like it HAS been done in the MFN, in our very own League 7, by Cincy.

actually I just looked at that player and thru his transactions I didn't see him moved from TE to RB because usually when you look thru a players transactions it will tell you he got moved from one position to another if you edit the filler to check position changes but leave rest blank

Pat Strobe = https://mfn7.myfootballnow.com/player/5152

only thing that got changed was his # number from 32 to 34 which even shows if anything he might have been moved from FB to RB or he was just a RB because only RBs and FBS have 30's in jerseys on offense.

I was trying to figure that out as well. TE is his 3rd Best, right behind FB... so maybe he was a FB. If so, that's insane considering the Speed/Acceleration/Ball Carry.

Strobe was drafted as a FB.
Brrexkl
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by Brrexkl @ 7/19/2016 9:18 pm
deanezag wrote:
Just to clear up the questions - He was drafted as a FB, switched to RB.
Appreciate that!
blackflys
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by blackflys @ 7/19/2016 10:33 pm
you can argue the fact and show me ratings all day long but the best advise you ccould take is to leave him and take what you can get. if i had a rb average below 5 i would be looking for something new weather its rb or OL. the chances of your TE being a threat agaist a good defense is very low. its not the ratings holdong you back its his weight and if he was 235 i would say maybe but probably not lose that weight . your talking 255 not gonna happen. i would bet 3 first rounders on it
blackflys
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by blackflys @ 7/19/2016 10:37 pm
you have donald richmond whats the need to make that switch. hes a 2500 yard rusher if you have the right ol and scheme.
punisher
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by punisher @ 7/19/2016 10:47 pm
deanezag wrote:
Strobe was drafted as a FB.

I figured he was a FB or a HB when he was drafted because only RB's and FB's on offense get the jersey numbers 32 or 34.
blackflys
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by blackflys @ 7/19/2016 11:03 pm
new argument....
without sounding like a **** . you need a new qb .. yours will never be good . cant tell you why but i gaurantee it . (den)
King of Bling
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by King of Bling @ 7/19/2016 11:14 pm
blackflys wrote:
new argument....
without sounding like a **** . you need a new qb .. yours will never be good . cant tell you why but i gaurantee it . (den)

lol, and fly has one that can help alleviate this dilemma :P
blackflys
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by blackflys @ 7/19/2016 11:21 pm
i got one who will end with a 90+ rating and throw 30+ tds but my back ups ****.
King of Bling
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by King of Bling @ 7/19/2016 11:22 pm
I was just joking around.

Regarding your 'guy who will be a 90'. Farris???
blackflys
Re: Class of 2023 Analysis (Discussion)
by blackflys @ 7/19/2016 11:23 pm
a 90 qb rating in his stats. not his skill rating